• Hello, editing works at least for me. “EDIT” link has low contrast and may not be visible well on some kinds of displays, see attachment.

  • Blake I agree and would like to add several things.

    For each recording there can be several types of additional data, they can coexist, though some of them make others somewhat obsolete:

    • William’s annotations for whole recording
    • Timestamps with short summary & tags. I think searching for questions in recording would be easy if waveform is…

    [Read more]

  • William W You are absolutely right about general direction. Details on how to do it depend on type of the wiki, choice of how data is structured, what external resources are used and how to link to them with timestamps. I think that it’d be useful to convert your annotations to wiki format as-is without timestamps and add a link to page with…[Read more]

  • Ted: wiki would work quite fine, I haven’t thought of that.

    Pros:

    • works right now
    • requires general sys admin knowledge to operate and support, if any. No need to look for a programmer that can work on the code, add a feature or fix a problem that popped up, that’s a very important thing.
    • multi-user editing is built-in, including logs and…

    [Read more]

  • JavaJeff: Dealing with utterances, fixing grammar and such are more relevant to manual transcription efforts. I think somebody is working on it now and it’s both very useful and time-consuming. I feel like it’s not possible to transcribe all recordings in the near future, so this project aims to make recordings searchable in the meantime. Also…[Read more]

  • Hi all, I’m thinking about creating a web site with searchable index of Culadasa’s audio and video recordings.

    There are several use cases:

    • from time to time I’d like to refer someone to Culadasa’s words on topic that interests them but I can’t find it,
    • on recent Patreon Q&A’s he gets asked some things he’s already answered in depth, but…

    [Read more]