<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dharma Treasure Community | Mateos | Activity</title>
	<link>http://dharmatreasurecommunity.org/members/mateos/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="http://dharmatreasurecommunity.org/members/mateos/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Mateos.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 11:32:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=4.2.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">374755f080c83ecb173eed69d823c417</guid>
				<title>Mateos replied to the topic No-self in the forum Principles of Dharma</title>
				<link>http://dharmatreasurecommunity.org/forums/topic/no-self/#post-2189</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2017 11:04:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for you reply &#8211; I like the way you describe emptiness in this quite tangible way. And it is the answer to my question, I guess. I am still presupposing a self of some sort, when I ask, why the mind does not optimize for &#8216;its&#8217; five aggregates. True No-self would mean there is nobody optimizing for pleasure or avoiding pain. Wisdom becomes&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2317"><a href="http://dharmatreasurecommunity.org/forums/topic/no-self/#post-2189" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2408fe82934890e9dddb124b4d9671d3</guid>
				<title>Mateos started the topic Milestone for Stage 4 in the forum Meditation</title>
				<link>http://dharmatreasurecommunity.org/forums/topic/milestone-for-stage-4</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2017 19:52:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In TMI, Culadasa and his co-authors state that Stage 4 has been passed once gross distractions are absent throughout the meditation session. I am wondering how strictly this is meant. Is it advised to stick to Stage 4 practice and not start the body scanning if within an hour of meditation, I usually have a few gross distractions between stretches&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2010"><a href="http://dharmatreasurecommunity.org/forums/topic/milestone-for-stage-4" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9e8d3adf99249349e6b8f5a48222e8d9</guid>
				<title>Mateos started the topic No-self in the forum Principles of Dharma</title>
				<link>http://dharmatreasurecommunity.org/forums/topic/no-self</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2017 19:36:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, thank you very much for this forum &#8211; it is very helpful!</p>
<p>My question is on the intellectual understanding of No-self.  Here is my admittedly very basic understanding, from which my question arises:<br />
&#8211; We are just the five aggregates<br />
&#8211; Everything, incl. our five aggreagtes, arises and passes away causally conditioned, and the whole of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2009"><a href="http://dharmatreasurecommunity.org/forums/topic/no-self" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>